Typographica boosted
“stolen from Bauer”
Helpful notes in this 1898 ATF.
Verified Journalists Posts
Search and explore the latest posts from verified journalists in one convenient location. Use the search bar to refine your results.
Exhale: The Supreme Court turns down a chance to narrow or kill the libel protections of Times v. Sullivan. New at Media Nation. https://dankennedy.net/2025/03/25/exhale-the-supreme-court-turns-down-a-chance-to-narrow-or-kill-times-v-sullivan/
@kalisz79 dziwne, u wiekszosci ludzi dziala :P
In a conversation with Tech Policy Press Associate Editor Cristiano Lima-Strong, Alvaro Bedoya discusses President Donald Trump’s efforts to oust him and another Democratic member from the Federal Trade Commission and what it means for government oversight of Big Tech. Listen/read: https://www.techpolicy.press/a-conversation-with-alvaro-bedoya-on-trumps-ftc-firings/
@davesdogmaggie well just for convenience's sake: https://www.wgbh.org/news/national/2025-03-25/feeling-scatterbrained-5-ways-to-focus-your-attention
lorax b. horne 🍉 boosted
Signal provides:
- Excellent protection against third party interception of communications (wiretapping).
- Limited protection against compromised (hacked) or lost devices
- No protection against certain common usage mistakes (accidentally including a reporter in your large group war planning chat).
lorax b. horne 🍉 boosted
@x0 No, Signal is not as "secure as any government solution", because it lacks specific features for protecting classified material from going to the wrong places. Signal does a good job with the cryptography, but there's much more to it than that. Signal lacks security labels, authenticated identities with clearance levels, policy enforcement, etc. Those features make it virtually impossible to add a reporter to your war planning thread.